Cincinnati Sun
CincinnatiSun.com Saturday 31st July 2010 Edition 212/8
  • More World News

  • Timberlake to lend voice to cartoon character
  • Audrina Patridge has huge crush on Johnny Depp
  • Roderiguez bored of movie remakes
  • 13 dead in China bus accident
  • UN to assemble Gaza flotilla investigation team Sunday
  • Kristen Stewart feels fans' pressure
  • Nicole Kidman loves gardening
  • Tiger Woods to participate in Dubai event
  • Obama asks Abbas to enter direct talks
  • Seven killed in Iraq violence
  • Canadian warplanes intercept Russian bombers
  • Drink red wine for healthier life
    Get World News headlines emailed to you daily.

    Lindsay Lohan demands $100 mn over 'milkaholic' ad
    Cincinnati Sun
    Tuesday 9th March, 2010  
    (IANS)


    Troubled actress Lindsay Lohan may not be getting the plum film roles anymore, but she might bring in millions in a lawsuit over a widely viewed television ad.

    Lohan, 23, has sued online brokerage E-Trade for $100 million alleging that a company ad in which a baby named Lindsay is referred to as a 'milkaholic' violated her rights, according to the New York Post Tuesday.

    The ad debuted during the Super Bowl in February and featured a baby boy apologising to his girlfriend for standing her up because he was too busy trading shares. 'And that milkaholic Lindsay wasn't over?' the baby girl asks before another baby girl pops into the screen saying, 'Milk-a-whaaat?' It was the latest in a series of ads featuring the babies in a bid to show the ease of the online trading system.

    In the lawsuit filed Monday, Lohan's lawyer said the ad was a clear reference to her client, who has a dismal record of substance abuse.

    'Many celebrities are known by one name only, and E-Trade is using that knowledge to profit,' Lohan's lawyer, Stephanie Ovadia, said in a statement. 'They're using her name as a parody of her life. Why didn't they use the name Susan? This is a subliminal message. Everybody's talking about it and saying it's Lindsay Lohan.'

    A statement from the ad agency that produced the commercial denied that it was referring to Lohan, and said they 'just used a popular baby name that happened to be the name of someone on the account team'.

      Email this story to a friend

    Have your say on this story

    Your nickname (optional)
    Message